By Casezy idea @ Shutterstock.com
In his piece discussing the Great Reset and face masks, Bill Sardi examines the idea that “Maybe natural immunity is superior to synthetic vaccines.” He writes (abridged):
Face masks at best only serve to delay and slow infection, which was their original intent, to keep hospitals from being overwhelmed until vaccines became available. There was no comment regarding the fact ~98% of face mask wearers received no benefit because the infection rate was low (~2%).
The flip side of the issue is that those who were infected developed some sort of future immunity. That would be good, not bad.
And then again, because of mutant viral strains, even if immunity was achieved, it would only be for a short time until exposure to a mutant strain.
There will be no abandonment of face masks until the public overcomes its fears. The case-to-fatality ratio of COVID-19 infection ranges from 0.00% to 1.63% (median 0.23%). In other words, the risk for COVID-19 related death is remote, about the same as the flu, and far lower than many other infectious diseases and diseases in some countries.
The fear is not based on truth.
Everyone should posit in their mind that vaccines don’t work without an operable immune system that requires zinc, vitamin C, vitamin D, selenium, lysine.
Maybe natural immunity is superior to synthetic vaccines.
If you’re willing to fight for Main Street America, click here to sign up for my free weekly email.
